edit this panel
Users who watch this page:
... and more
This site is okay, and was not deleted.
Helmut_pdorf 16 May 2013 07:03
http://badwebcomics.wikidot.com/ is really not good in my oppinion
Notice: Comments are in reverse order! - Newest first..
They are deleting now the abusive posts.
On the site the new admin is willing to move the abusive threads into hidden/deleted threads griup and remove the old posts.
See also the last discussion on http://badwebcomics.wikidot.com/forum/t-663671/comments/show#post-1821660
If you detect another content with abusive content - please notice here and i will get the admin to delete them.
Service is my success. My webtips:www.blender.org (Open source), Wikidot-Handbook.
Sie können fragen und mitwirken in der deutschsprachigen » User-Gemeinschaft für WikidotNutzer oder
im deutschen » Wikidot Handbuch ?
I have forwarded your post to the wikidot community admins - we will hear what they think about the new status of this site.
Question: have you writtten/asked the Master admin of the site to remove the whole thread ?
edit: I have joined the site to answer the last post of the new admin of changing the wiki to another platform.
His last post was to have deleted all the content …
I got as a new member only the message: http://badwebcomics.wikidot.com/newbie-guide
Now my last post on this site:
Why is the site deemed Okay and forums are now open for all to see all of a sudden?
There's no explanation whatsoever, why is the wiki letting it's own policy on libel be broken?
Is the libel not clear enough?
They're still pointing out in their forums how specific artists are "homosexuals" and "pedophiles" now completely in the open:
I set it back to legitimate..
There was a discussion and reporting to the wikidot team - and the site is back now and will be soon private (perhaps),
Anotherr message: there is a new Master admin now setup (oddguy - after the old Evilkritter has disappeared.
No idea what is now ongoing in the future.
Bad webcomics is a trolling website posing as "funny critiques" of web-based artists.
In fact is a wiki that is not actually interested in "honest criticism" but is rather interested in: being negative, citing untruths based on inconclusive or partial evidence and stirring up flamewars
All of which causes harm to artists that their critiques are targeting.
Quote from the badwebcomics.wikidot.com frontpage:
"If you are here because we said the comic who's fanbase you are a part of is shit; If you feel that we have wronged you in any way, then from the bottom of our hearts we would like to tell you: Shut the hell up."
Basically the creators of bad webcomics do not care whatsoever about whether personal harm or harassment will come to artists from their libelous articles.
Proof that Bad Webcomics is nothing but hate-speech website can be found straight on their article creation guide page:
"This is a wiki discussing webcomics in general, with a focus on hateful and cruel torment of those that do not meet our standards"
Take any article and you will find countless examples where the article writers of BadWebcomics call the webcomic artists that they're critiquing: "fat", "shit", "worthless", "lesbian", "racist", "stupid", "fucked up", etc.
The BadWebcomics forums are no better and are filled with defamatory statements, accusations and wild speculation about how artists can be insulted and harassed, by twisting and misquoting statements that the artists have made in the past.
Just in this one thread they speculate out how various artists are: "retard", "homophobe", "pedophile", etc.
I'm not allowed to post in the forum links you've provided because I don't have enough "Karma".
Do you know of any wikidot admins whom I could personally contact to list all the examples of libelous and hate-speech articles? There are literally hundreds of them on badwebcomics.wikidot
Please mention on the administration forum that the http://badwebcomics.wikidot.com/ isn't spam site, but a coordinated hate-speech website the primary purpose of which is to create libelous articles targeting individuals.
Even their tag title is "Improving our media, with hatred"
Every single one of its articles is full of racism, sexism, hate speech & libel.